NECC 08 – Planning for Systemic Change – Part 1

My attendance at NECC in San Antonio was made possible through the HP Technology for Teaching Leadership grant award. Last year a team of five teachers from our school were awarded the Technology for Teaching grant and because of our success with implementing our Pond Partners project we were awarded the additional funding as part of the Leadership grant for year two. We now have 15 teachers on the project with 13 k-5 classrooms participating. Saturday and Sunday at San Antonio were spent in meetings with14 other schools awarded the Leadership grant to discuss and plan for the coming year.

Debra Reed, our district’s K-12 Science Curriculum Supervisor, and I mapped our course for next year. The biggest shift in year two of the grant is moving from project-based planning to an initiative based on systemic change for our elementary building. Here’s our draft from our initial planning sessions.

Focus of Team Initiative

Goal #1: Our most important initiative is to shift instructional practices in our school to become constructivist in nature using inquiry-based methods. Both problem and project-based experiences will be the foundation for long-term student-driven investigations centered on living environment concepts. All teachers and students should be involved in real issues that require creativity and innovation, communication and collaboration, critical thinking and problem solving to generate possible solutions and share findings and learning experiences with stakeholders.

Goal #2: Our second initiative is to increase the use of technology to facilitate learning for both teachers and students. We believe that technology (goal #2) must serve pedagogy (goal #1). We believe the infusion of technology must enable teachers and students to research, create, communicate, and collaborate. This initiative will create the transformative process we are seeking in technology infusion for our teachers and students.

Initiative Objectives

As a result of our initiative, teachers will:

  • Understand constructivist theory
  • Implement inquiry-based lessons (5E) and experiences (including PBL)
  • Integrate technology into lessons
  • Involve students in real-world issues that require creativity and innovation
  • Establish their own personal learning network
  • Design pre/post and formative/summative assessments tied to NYS/National standards
  • Use data to inform instructional practices
  • Work in collaborative teams focused on student learning

What will change?

Our current state of practice reveals many teachers using traditional, teacher-centered (didactic) direct instruction, where students are passive receptors of knowledge. The change will be the systemic impact on instructional practices and student learning.

As a result of our initiative, students will:

  • Develop and implement their own scientific inquiry investigations
  • Collect, organize, display, and analyze data from investigations to make decisions and develop solutions
  • Increase content understandings related to the living environment
  • Use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively
  • Create and share multi-media presentations to reflect information learned through the project
  • Exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology

What will change?

The change will be the shift towards a student-centered environment where they take the lead and responsibility for their learning and are supported and guided by classroom teachers.

As a result of our initiative, systems of technology support, leadership and administration will:

  • Facilitate and support collaborative technology-enriched learning environments conducive to innovation for improved learning.
  • Support hardware/software/networking

Plan for Measuring Impact on Teaching and Learning

Guiding Action Research Questions

  1. What is the effect of implementing inquiry-based instruction on student learning?
  2. How does technology support learning?

Multiple Measures of Data

  1. Student Learning
    1. How do the post test measures of participating classes compare to the control classes?
  2. Perceptions
    1. How do students, parents, and teachers gauge the importance/value of learning through inquiry?
    2. How do students, parents, and teachers gauge the importance/value of using technology?
  3. Demographics
    1. How is student learning affected within various demographic groups? (special ed., gender)
  4. School Processes
    1. How does the collaborative nature of this initiative support the shift in instructional practice and school/district goals?
    2. How does this initiative support collaborative technology-enriched learning environments that are conducive to innovation for improved learning?

Student Measures

  • pre/post content assessment
  • open ended task (post)
  • journals/learning logs
  • inquiry investigations
  • graphing & analysis of data collection
  • multi-media presentations
  • surveys
  • post reflections

Teacher Measures

  • survey on student learning
  • reflections
  • pre/post HP technology survey
  • pre/post Klem South pedagogy & technology use survey
  • peer classroom observations

Leadership, Technology Support, & Administration

  • survey
  • reflections
  • classroom observations

What’s important to note about this initiative is that it is TEACHER DRIVEN with administrative support. Planning for this systemic change for our school is incredibly exciting, yet brought about some personal stress and uncertainty. Last year it was a tremendous amount of work to be the Lead Teacher on the grant with just 4 other teachers and three classrooms working on the year-long project. Now that I’ll be working with 14 other teachers and 13 classrooms, how will we not only implement the environmental science year-long project with k-5 students, but also attain the pedagogical changes in instruction? In my next blog post, I’ll share what happened when our team of teachers in San Antonio met to tackle the obstacles and create a workable plan to create cohesion, excitement, and success for all teachers on the grant.

Questions and feedback on our plan are welcomed as well as other examples of systemic changes driven from the classroom.

Reflecting & Planning Ahead

This morning I met with Jim Schwartz, a professor in the Childhood Education Department at SJFC, to reflect on our goals for the partnership we have established between his pre-service class and the MST PORTAL at Klem South Elementary.

The goals for Jim are to have his students experience inquiry-based teaching and learning prior to their student teaching placements as well as to provide more authentic conversations regarding planning, student assessment, instructional best practices, and the reflective nature of teaching.

Here in the MST PORTAL we are looking to continue to promote open, reflective teaching and learning through shared conversations and experiences with professionals outside of our school via scheduled videoconferencing chats, streaming lessons/presentations, and face-to-face gatherings. Our continued goal is to expand the number of teachers taking advantage of the job-embedded professional development opportunities made possible because of this unique partnership. Whether teachers want to learn more about inquiry-based mathematics (especially with our new math series), the Backward Design process, using technology to support student learning, or simply to gather the collective ideas of 20 eager pre-service teachers to help plan a lesson or unit, these experiences can happen within the school day, side-by-side with another teacher(s) for guidance and support, and as an integrated part of classroom planning and instruction.

In February, Jim’s students will be exploring Understanding by Design and the Six Facets of Understanding including discussing what “counts” as evidence of understanding. To follow up on this work, we have a videoconference scheduled on March 6th to examine and discuss student work samples. If you’d like to join the conversation and perhaps share samples of student work (math problem-solving would be great), just let me know.

For our next videoconference on April 3rd, we are seeking interested teachers to collaborate with the pre-service teachers on the initial development of a math/science inquiry-based lesson. As part of their class requirements at SJFC, the pre-service teachers will work on the development of a webquest to support the content of the lesson. This activity will be inquiry-based, provide distinct roles for students, and may provide a hands-on component. Once completed, teachers will be able to implement the webquest with their students (either the entire class or with a small group) and then reflect on the experience and effectiveness of student learning.

If you have any comments on our progress to-date with this partnership or ideas to share, please comment.