We plan on streaming the session at http://www.ustream.tv/mstportal starting at 10:45 EST on Monday.

• Includes learning in the field as well as the classroom
• Incorporates the teaching methods of outdoor education, experiential education, and place-based education
• Is inherently interdisciplinary
• Promotes school/community partnerships
• Is hands-on, student-centered, inquiry driven, engages higher level thinking skills, and relevant to students everyday lives
• Develops awareness, increases knowledge, builds skills, and creates the capacity for stewardship and good citizenship regarding the environment upon which we depend for life support.
• Helps address the causes of “nature deficit disorder”
• Boosts student achievement in math, science, reading, writing and social studies

Our work with students on our HP Technology for Teaching Leadership Grant directly ties their learning to real-world issues and challenges as we examine human impacts on the limits of our natural resources. With just nine days of school under our belt, 280+ students are now primed and ready to assume their roles as environmental scientist and take action. What have we accomplished as a team so far as we wade into environmental education with our kids?

• Team name: We are now known as the Klem South Stream Team.
• Collaborative space set up: http://streamteam.wikispaces.com.
• Making connections: So far we have 3 other schools across the country joining our work. Keep checking the wiki to see how the kids communicate their experiences with one another while extending their learning. Our first Skype call to chat with our learning partners took place today.
• Identifying on-site stream locations: This was tricky finding safe, accessible sites with homeowners permission to allow us access throughout the year, but we did it.
• Starting point for learning: We developed and administered pre-assessments K-5. As part of our partnership with SJFC, pre-service teachers will be conducting data analysis of both classroom and individual student performance and sharing their findings with our team so we may target instruction appropriately.
• Generate excitement: A core group of students held an assembly for all of the classes to introduce them to the project. Not a polished performance, but with only 30 minutes of planning time & writing their scripts, they did a good job.
• Start exploring: All classrooms have visited the MST room to explore the Why? and How? of the project. We’ve learned how to collect water quality data using handhelds and sensors as well as conduct a visual survey of the stream and surrounding area. We’ll also be examining and documenting the macroinvertebrates in our stream samples to provide important information on stream health.
• Get outside: Trips for 14 classes are scheduled and begin next Tuesday. Let the fun begin!

After all of our initial on-site visits have been completed, the real work by students in the classroom begins. Stay tuned for more.

Teachers at Klem South Elementary care deeply about environmental issues. If you are not familiar with the importance of environmental education for our children, please visit the Campaign for Environmental Literacy for more information. They have also been leading advocacy efforts on H.R. 3036 No Child Left Inside Act of 2008 , scheduled for a vote in the House this week. Click here to have a voice and take action on environmental education issues.

Debra Reed, our district’s K-12 Science Curriculum Supervisor, and I mapped our course for next year. The biggest shift in year two of the grant is moving from project-based planning to an initiative based on systemic change for our elementary building. Here’s our draft from our initial planning sessions.

Focus of Team Initiative

Goal #1: Our most important initiative is to shift instructional practices in our school to become constructivist in nature using inquiry-based methods. Both problem and project-based experiences will be the foundation for long-term student-driven investigations centered on living environment concepts. All teachers and students should be involved in real issues that require creativity and innovation, communication and collaboration, critical thinking and problem solving to generate possible solutions and share findings and learning experiences with stakeholders.

Goal #2: Our second initiative is to increase the use of technology to facilitate learning for both teachers and students. We believe that technology (goal #2) must serve pedagogy (goal #1). We believe the infusion of technology must enable teachers and students to research, create, communicate, and collaborate. This initiative will create the transformative process we are seeking in technology infusion for our teachers and students.

Initiative Objectives

As a result of our initiative, teachers will:

• Understand constructivist theory
• Implement inquiry-based lessons (5E) and experiences (including PBL)
• Integrate technology into lessons
• Involve students in real-world issues that require creativity and innovation
• Establish their own personal learning network
• Design pre/post and formative/summative assessments tied to NYS/National standards
• Use data to inform instructional practices
• Work in collaborative teams focused on student learning

What will change?

Our current state of practice reveals many teachers using traditional, teacher-centered (didactic) direct instruction, where students are passive receptors of knowledge. The change will be the systemic impact on instructional practices and student learning.

As a result of our initiative, students will:

• Develop and implement their own scientific inquiry investigations
• Collect, organize, display, and analyze data from investigations to make decisions and develop solutions
• Increase content understandings related to the living environment
• Use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively
• Create and share multi-media presentations to reflect information learned through the project
• Exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology

What will change?

The change will be the shift towards a student-centered environment where they take the lead and responsibility for their learning and are supported and guided by classroom teachers.

As a result of our initiative, systems of technology support, leadership and administration will:

• Facilitate and support collaborative technology-enriched learning environments conducive to innovation for improved learning.
• Support hardware/software/networking

Plan for Measuring Impact on Teaching and Learning

Guiding Action Research Questions

1. What is the effect of implementing inquiry-based instruction on student learning?
2. How does technology support learning?

Multiple Measures of Data

1. Student Learning
   1. How do the post test measures of participating classes compare to the control classes?
2. Perceptions
   1. How do students, parents, and teachers gauge the importance/value of learning through inquiry?
   2. How do students, parents, and teachers gauge the importance/value of using technology?
3. Demographics
   1. How is student learning affected within various demographic groups? (special ed., gender)
4. School Processes
   1. How does the collaborative nature of this initiative support the shift in instructional practice and school/district goals?
   2. How does this initiative support collaborative technology-enriched learning environments that are conducive to innovation for improved learning?

Student Measures

• pre/post content assessment
• open ended task (post)
• journals/learning logs
• inquiry investigations
• graphing & analysis of data collection
• multi-media presentations
• surveys
• post reflections

Teacher Measures

• survey on student learning
• reflections
• pre/post HP technology survey
• pre/post Klem South pedagogy & technology use survey
• peer classroom observations

Leadership, Technology Support, & Administration

• survey
• reflections
• classroom observations

What’s important to note about this initiative is that it is TEACHER DRIVEN with administrative support. Planning for this systemic change for our school is incredibly exciting, yet brought about some personal stress and uncertainty. Last year it was a tremendous amount of work to be the Lead Teacher on the grant with just 4 other teachers and three classrooms working on the year-long project. Now that I’ll be working with 14 other teachers and 13 classrooms, how will we not only implement the environmental science year-long project with k-5 students, but also attain the pedagogical changes in instruction? In my next blog post, I’ll share what happened when our team of teachers in San Antonio met to tackle the obstacles and create a workable plan to create cohesion, excitement, and success for all teachers on the grant.

Questions and feedback on our plan are welcomed as well as other examples of systemic changes driven from the classroom.

Here’s an excerpt of an email sent to me from Bud Andress, Sr. Park Warden – Special Projects PARKS CANADA.

“Every once and awhile one will come across an initiative taken on by young students with the aid of their teacher and others that simply leaves you awe struck. Such is the case with your video about early ship navigation in ice in the St. Lawrence River. Please know, and tell your class that I think they have made a fantastic video…Young people, on both the U.S. and Canadian sides of the River, like your grade 4 class, are the future of our communities here in the 1000 Islands. It is important that a healthy river ecosystem be there for them as they become adults and raise their own children. It is ever refreshing to see such an environmentally sound message delivered so well.”

Pete Grannis, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation also sent a letter to the students.

“I wanted to let you know how delighted I was to view your video production Save the River on the web. It is one of the most impressive presentations of an important issue that I can recall from my days as a legislator and now as Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation. I commend you all for both the creativity and quality of your work along with your strong commitment to protecting New York’s environment and the great St. Lawrence River.

I strongly believe your use of new, multi-media techniques and the internet places you at the forefront of environmental advocacy. When a sincere and professional piece like yours is made available on the web, your message can reach a huge audience and have a real impact. Together, your ability to harness this technology in the early years of education suggests great possibilities for future efforts to reach out to people and build awareness of environmental issues. …”

Then the letter arrived from Collister Johnson, Jr., the Administrator of the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation. While acknowledging the students’ environmental interests, Mr. Johnson is obviously not pleased with the video. He writes,

“But I am concerned, and frankly surprised, that your teachers and school would allow you to be used and exploited by an organization to advance its own political agenda. Unfortunately, your video, which follows the script supplied by Save the River, contains allegations and assertions that are simply not accurate, nor based on science. In a word, it is propaganda. You may not be familiar with that word, but I hope your teachers will use this exchange of letters as a learning experience and explain the meaning of it to you.

…If you are ever in Washington, D.C., please let me know so that my staff and I can further explain to you the important work that is supported by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.”

So what were the students’ reactions to the letter? First, they wondered why he had to use “such big words.” Once they discovered what word propaganda meant, they became defensive about their work and the message they were trying to convey. I asked if they wanted to continue the conversation with Mr. Johnson and they wholeheartedly said yes.

Here’s what they wrote.

Administer Collister Johnson, Jr.
Policy Headquarters – St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
Suite W32-300
Washington, D.C. USA 20590

Dear Mr. Johnson,

Thank you for writing us a letter and commenting on our Save the River video. We would like you to elaborate on your thoughts about the problems with our video. Since we did quite a bit of research, we are wondering what you think is not accurate. Would you be willing to videoconference with us so we may have a discussion with you? If this is not possible, would one of your staff members be able to chat with us about our environmental concerns with winter shipping on the river?

Thank you and we look forward to hearing back from you.

Sincerely,

4^th Grade Students at Klem Road South Elementary School

The letter was sent out on Monday, April 21^st. So far we haven’t heard back yet. Hopefully Mr. Johnson will reply before our last day of school on June 23^rd. His letter was actually a great eye-opener for the students, parents, and me. The follow up discussion I had with this group of students was fantastic and truly extended upon their work. Students learned that not everyone will agree on important environmental issues, to make sure you have reputable sources of information (like the Dept. of Environmental Services), take the good with the bad, don’t be afraid to ask clarifying questions, stick with your beliefs, and persevere. Let’s hope Mr. Johnson will agree to continue the conversation with these kids.

| View | Upload your own

Data Supporting Impact on Student Learning
When examining the data it is important to note that the three participating classrooms have high populations of students receiving special services. Taking this into account, the gains made through the hands-on, technology rich classroom environments are noteworthy.

2^nd graders in Eva Burns’ class and a control class were given two different assessments; a ten question multiple choice test and a scientific process design task. Results reveal that students in Eva’s class scored higher on several of the multiple choice questions, in particular the questions about seasonal changes, making observations, and identifying correct units of measure.The scientific design task revealed significant differences in the depth of student responses from Eva’s class. We feel the hands-on inquiry-based focus of this project was the factor resulting in students in her class demonstrating a deeper understanding of the scientific method.

3^rd graders in Martha Erbland’s class and a control class were also given two different assessments; a 15 question multiple choice test and a scientific process design task. While the results of the test did not show significant gains, responses on the scientific design task from Martha’s students showed a much deeper understanding and application of the scientific method. Martha also stated that beyond these scores she has seen a marked improvement in her students’ questioning skills, ability to make connections across subject areas, and their understanding and interpretation of data.

4^th graders in Donna Hoffend’s class and a control class were given a fifteen question objective test. Results reveal no differences in student results between the classes. It is also interesting to note that 75% of current 4^th graders had the opportunity to work on a similar year-long project while in 3^rd grade. After lengthy discussions of the data, the team feels as though outside factors may have affected the results. Donna has students with multiple needs including students who receive weekly psychology and talk mentoring sessions. Coupled with the extreme academic needs and special education services, we were very pleased with the test results.

Impact on Instruction
One of our main objectives was to infuse technology into project lesson plans to engage learners, promote higher-order thinking skills, and provide authentic experiences. Through our individual professional development plans and our face-to-face meetings, each member was able to redesign lessons to become more constructivist in nature. Eva stated, “In the past, I gave my students all the information they needed to know. I told them what they would be learning. This year, I am able to give them the technology tools they need in order to find out what they want to know about. We used inquiry throughout the project and students were more motivated to learn because they had an invested interest in what we were learning about.”

The level of personal confidence with technology integration has soared for all participants. Donna noted, “Many of these new technological skills allowed me to create new and interactive lessons for my students.” Just looking at the pre and post data from our technology surveys reveals an incredible amount of growth in regards to the use of technology to support learning.

Another objective was to participate in a Professional Learning Community to reflect on improving student performance throughout the project. Chris reflected, “Perhaps the most important improvement to my teaching repertoire was the collaboration I had with team members. I learned how to redirect our focus based on the questions and interests of our students and the data collected from formative assessments.” This focus has afforded us opportunities to open our practice and learn from each other in ways we have never experienced before.

What’s Next?
Now we wait to see if we will be awarded a continuation and expansion of the grant for our school next year. If awarded, ten additional teachers will join and we’ll expand our focus to “Environmental Stewardship” K-5. If not, I’m sure this team of teachers will work on other problem and project-based learning experiences with their kids next year and encourage other grade level team members to join in.

While this was the most intensive project I have worked on in years, it was by far the most rewarding working as a collaborative team and seeing the kids present their findings, reflect using VoiceThread (in progress), and seek out new learning opportunities. Isabelle wrote on the Pond Partners wiki, “Fourth grade learned about potable water and how we waste it. I think we should also take into consideration how much garbage we throw out. Do you think we could all team up to try and recycle more? Are garbage dumps are getting full of things that we can recycle? Anything that has a 1 or a 2 on the bottom you can recycle. Lets all recycle!” I see a possible PBL topic for next year!

I’d love to learn more from other classroom teachers who are collecting and analyzing data to identify the impact of technology and/or PBL on learning for both students and teachers. Please share your ideas and suggestions. Thanks!

Project Summary
Students in grades 2, 3, and 4 worked as environmental scientists as they discovered the hidden world of macro-invertebrates in our local ponds and stream and from this investigation developed an understanding of the importance of clean, fresh water on our entire ecosystem. On-site field observations and water quality sampling occurred throughout the year and classrooms developed their own inquiry-based investigations to further deepen their content understandings and enhance their scientific process skills. Students explored life cycles of macro-invertebrates, invasive species of Lake Ontario, and issues regarding potable water.

Presentation Skills
Besides the incredible amount of science concepts and technology skills these students learned, the presentation skills of the representative group of students from the three classes were outstanding. A multi-media presentation was shared with the Monroe County Water Coalition at their board meeting at the BrightonTown Hall (and we were able to videoconference with the rest of the students back at school so they could also participate in the Q&A session), at our Webster Board of Education televised meeting in April, and with classmates and community members at an assembly at our school. Here’s the Ustream of our school assembly.
What was awesome about these presentations was the professionalism, poise, and confidence these students, ages 7-10, demonstrated in front of both peers and adults. Way to go!

~Rachel Carson

A group of 4^th graders assumed the role of student environmentalists and create a public service announcement to make citizens and policy makers aware of the concerns regarding the early opening date of shipping on the St. Lawrence Seaway. Students synthesized information from the ecology unit and created a video to voice their opinions, concerns, and facts regarding shipping on the St. Lawrence River.

Shortly after posting the video on YouTube and sharing the link with the Save the River organization and biologist from the NYS DEC, I received this email.

Hello Ms. Smith,

I’m an old retired fishery biologist who worked for the NYSDEC. I used to work on the fisheries research vessel the R/V SETH GREEN. I spent many days and nights working nearby to Webster. In all I worked 35 years on Lake Ontario and loved every minute of my work.

During that time, I saw many environmental presentations, and I made a number of presentations myself. I traveled throughout the Great Lakes and I was also lucky to get to know many very good scientists, both Canadian and American.

At this point you are probably wondering where I’m going with this little email. The point I want to make is that I’ve been around the “Lakes” and I’m familiar with most of the issues and I’ve seen many environmental presentations.

Given my background, it should mean more to your class when I say that in all those years I don’t think I’ve seen a better presentation of an environmental issue than what your class did with the seaway opening video.

Would you please, stand in front of your students and shout, “Class, you’ve got class!” Their video was eye-catching and appealing, their information was accurate and up-to-date, and your student’s presentations were passionate, professional and entertaining. If there is a grade better than A+, you need to give it to your students.

Please tell your class that they have done more than a super job. I hope all of them feel good about what they’ve done, and I also hope that some of them might think about a future career in environmental science — New York and other states and provinces will need good people, like your students, to work on the Great Lakes on vessels like the SETH GREEN.

As you know, Ms. Smith, your class did a classy job, because they had a very classy teacher. You should be very proud. Tell your superintendent to give you a raise immediately (I was also a school board member, too).

Best wishes to a great group of student environmentalists and a great teacher.

Warm Regards,
Clif Schneider
Cape Vincent, NY

Much thanks to Clif for allowing me to share his kind words and acknowledgement of the hard work and effort these students put into their project. I have no doubt that each of these students will continue to be responsible stewards of our environment and perhaps one day pursue a career in the sciences. We’ll certainly need kids like this taking charge of the issues facing our Earth in the coming years.

When you teach science, you teach literacy. Kids learn to observe, ask questions, predict, sequence, infer, draw conclusions, analyze, evaluate, summarize, compare/contrast, solve problems, and read and write in meaningful contexts. Modeling metacognition is such a big part of elementary science. We focus their attention on what is going on in their heads as they try to make meaning of situations and identifying strategies to assist in the process. This is exactly what we want them to do when they have a book in front of them. We want kids to be active participants in the learning process as they attempt to make meaning. So why is it that reading is taught during “reading” time and science it taught during “science” time or whenever teachers find the time?

Finding the time to teach science is essential. David Warlick recently blogged about the diminishing time elementary teachers are spending teaching science since NCLB took effect. David writes,

Improving reading and math skills is not the problem. The problem is how we’re paying for it.

Extra ELA time is not the answer nor is taking away recess.

Brian Crosby shares an account of how we are paying for it as he tells of students’ reactions to the recent eclipse. Students were scared, but it’s even more frightening to think about the future implications for these kids not having the opportunities to explore science in elementary school. I loved reading the comment from Doug Noon.

Teach Science. Teach Social Studies. Be a radical.

On the flip side, Jenny, a 5th grade teacher blogged about the disparity of time devoted to teaching reading between elementary and middle/high school. As in most elementary classrooms, her students devote much less time to social studies and science than ELA and math. She wrote,

I feel that my students have to be able to read, write, and do math in order to be able to truly understand social studies or science. So I don’t have any concerns about how we spend our time…

What are your thoughts about how we spend our time at the elementary level?
Powered by ScribeFire.

Kindergarten – Students were presented with a problem from Mrs. Benz. She asked for their help with her upcoming book order. Should she buy more fiction or nonfiction books for Kindergarten? The students figured out that they needed to vote for their choice, but they also realized that all of Kindergarten classes needed to participate (both teachers and both AM/PM groups). Next they needed to figure out a way to find the sum of the addends. They decided to use unifix cubes. A calculator was used to check for accuracy. Together using the SMART Board, students were guided in creating a bar graph and circle graph using an Excel template. Results were shared with Mrs. Benz. Next task – decide which book titles and how many of each should be purchased with a set amount of money. This job will allow for multiple answers and require decision making and problem solving skills. Students will be working on this during the week.

Pond Partners Group – (Mrs. Burns, Mrs. Erbland, and Mrs. Hoffend) Last week Martha, Eva, and I trekked out to Mill Creek in the morning to collect macro invertebrate samples to bring back for the kids to identify. While we were in the stream we didn’t think we were too successful with our nets, but when we got back to the classroom the little creatures were visible. We used the document camera to project the samples in the tray onto the SMART Board. The kids LOVED seeing the images swimming around in the tray up on the board. Using a dichotomous key they were able to identify several of the macro invertebrates. This was an excellent opportunity to work on the process skills of observing, predicting, and inferencing. Students also added information and discussion topics to our Pond Partners Wiki. Although we did identify several macro invertebrates during the activity, the limited sample did not allow students to draw accurate conclusions about the water quality at Mill Creek. Our next on-site visit will be in January. Check out some of our pictures on My Flickr.

3rd Grade – Each morning a small group of students collect weather data – temperature, wind speed, sky conditions, precipitation, shadow length, and the photoperiod (amount of daylight). At the end of 2 weeks, data is graphed and shared with teachers to use in the classroom. Our problem – we haven’t had ANY clear, sunny skies at 9 a.m. so we haven’t been able to measure our shadow stick length in weeks! That’s Webster this time of year.

4th Grade – A select group of students is working on creating a public service video regarding winter shipping on the St. Lawrence River. They are concerned about the increased dangers of an oil spill during the icy conditions on the river during the late winter/early spring months. They are in the initial planning stages of asking questions, identifying what information they need to gather, determining how they will find and research the information, and brainstorming creative ideas to incorporate into the video.

What else is happening?

• JoAnna and Eva have both started using Twitter! Be a Tweet and join us.
• The Pond Partners group has participated in several webinars through ISTE to learn more about technology in the classroom.
• More and more teachers are developing creative, multi-media lessons using their SMART Board and students are loving it! Look for new upgrades for the Notebook software soon. Join the SMART Exchange – a resource center and community network that provides a wealth of resources for technology-enabled learning.
• Several 3rd grade teachers are ready to start their first iEarn projects – Compass Kidz and My Most Prized Possession. See me if you want to explore global learning projects for your class.
• Holly and Eva have their classes set up to use handhelds daily for various ELA and math activities. Martha’s class will be starting this week.
• Ning, Twitter, del.icio.us, Elluminate, blogging, wikis…. no need to ask just me. Ask your principal, Mary Ann Krog. We are both participating in the Western New York Powerful Learning Practices group. (wny-plp)
• Still interested in joining a Collegial Circle to learn more about how Web 2.o tools and technologies can be used to improve learning? We’ll be exploring presentations from the K12 Online Conference starting after the New Year.